Nike Pegasus 33 Review

The Nike Pegasus 33

Nike makes another very good running shoe in a competitive price range.

The Pegasus 33 is a good shoe by Nike, just wasn’t really for me. I’ll get to why in just a moment. This shoe is lightweight, well made, and great for road and light terrain.

My running experience is amateur, only in the sense that I am not a competitive runner. I average about per week miles of 10 to 15. I run mostly on road surfaces and very rarely on light trails with these shoes.

On to the shoe:



As you can see above, I put about 34 miles on this pair of Nike Pegasus 33. That is just barely broken in I know, however, I found that my feet just didn’t really care for this model of shoe. Still extremely comfortable and lightweight, the Pegasus 33 is made a little too narrow for me. I wouldn’t say that I have a wide foot by any means, but this shoe just didn’t have the room I enjoy in the forefoot. Otherwise, a great shoe. Notice the toe box on the Pegasus 33 – narrow at the front compared to my newer Winflow 5. Very noticeable when running.


I enjoy a lightweight shoe and this as with the Nike Run Swift I last reviewed, definitely is in the lightweight shoe category.

The only modification to my shoes is an aftermarket insert. I use Sofsole inserts in my running shoes – makes all the difference for me.


  • Lightweight
  • Cool and breathable
  • As with the Run Swift, a flywire construction on the sides provide extra support for the mid-foot
  • You can still get this model and the price point is a very affordable $60 USD
  • The sole is quite soft and comfortable while running – very surprising in this price range.


  • With the lightweight of these shoes, you are kind of restricted to a smooth surface. Not sure that is a drawback to the shoe – I use a different shoe for running trails or more aggressive terrain.
  • Aggressive runners might wear these out very quickly
  • Limited stability – If you need a stability shoe this is not for you

As you can see – still looking good with no signs of construction failure.

Click on each photo for a closer look.

I wanted to like the Pegasus 33 – the narrow toe box was kind of a deal breaker for me. Again, I do not have a wide foot at all but the shoe just wasn’t doing it for me; especially running.

I am giving the Pegasus 33 a 3 out of 5. I still rank it fairly high even though I didn’t really like it. The shoe still has all the attributes I look for – lightweight, a really soft sole, good construction, and a price point that is well below many other brands.

Read some of my other reviews:

Running and Fitness Reviews

Diadora Mythos Fly Hip – Review

Nike Run Swift 2017 Review

Garmin Vivosmart Hr

Men’s Salomon Wings Flyte 2 Trail Running Shoe – Review


Consider Donating

If you enjoy reading Midwest Bliss and find our content enjoyable, please consider making a donation to help us keep our site operating. Thank you for visiting Midwest Bliss

Midwest Bliss 

If you like any of our photography, please send us an email to requests prints or other artwork. We’re happy to share our work.

Don’t forget to follow along with Midwest Bliss.

Leave us a comment – We like to hear from readers. 


All material © unless otherwise stated.

Disclaimer: I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites. I simply provide you a link to the product on Amazon and if you purchase that product I am paid a small commission. The price of the product is the same to you with or without my assistance – there is no cost to you for using product links on my page.




Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.